An analysis of the responsibility of a a military officer in the protection of us citizens

Department members responding as assist units will activate the BWC for all of the above-listed incidents.

An analysis of the responsibility of a a military officer in the protection of us citizens

The Central Intelligence Agency drugged American citizens without their knowledge or consent. It used university facilities and personnel without their knowledge. Where else could an American boy lie, cheat, rape and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the All Highest?

These people broke into an FBI office in Pennsylvania, rifled through the filing cabinets and leaked to the press documents detailing the abuses suffered by a wide variety of activists, including a long-term plan to destroy Martin Luther King Jr.: In barely concealed language, King was told to commit suicide before the award ceremony or risk seeing his "filthy, abnormal fraudulent self" exposed to the nation.

He accepted the award and lived four more years until his assassination. At this point victims began to come forward with claims of being horribly abused in these programs, one of the most famous is a woman named Candy Jones who described in stunning detail a tale of corruption and abuse.

When Jimmy Carter became President in he promptly moved to introduce a modicum of control, he instituted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act establishing an 11 member secret court to oversee the surveillance activities of our covert agencies.

As an example of the limited reporting requirements for the court we have the first report issued to Vice President Mondale from Attorney General Benjamin R. During calendar yearapplications were made for orders and extensions of orders approving electronic surveillance under the Act.

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court issued orders granting authority for the requested electronic surveillances. No orders were entered which modified or denied the requested authority.

Both the Rockefeller Commission and the Church Committee revealed a long standing pattern of both developing new psychological, pharmaceutical and radiological technologies, to influence individuals and groups and long standing pattern of behavior whereby politically disruptive citizens were systematically targeted, harassed and destroyed.

Yet there have, to date, been no provisions instituted which would stop this behavior, nor is there any guarantee that these kinds of covert programs ever actually ceased.

The only practical change engendered by the disclosures of the s was to drive these kinds of operations further into the shadows. There was, however, no public debate surrounding these black operations because they were classified under the guise of national security.

However, tighter restrictions on human experiment including accountability and transparency did not occur untilwhen President Clinton instituted revised protocols on human experiments.

Official reports insist that the research involving experiments during the s through the s was destroyed.

10 U.S. Code ยง - Secretary of Defense | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Yet, the scientists involved went without punishment, free to continue their careers. Can we accept that all the psychological research conducted with government funding up to the s was simply destroyed? At this time, the American public has no way to answer this question.

The current administration classifies more information than any previous US administration. Unclassified documents have even been recalled and re-classified. In the s nuclear radiation experiments on humans became public knowledge and Russian tests making use of the electromagnetic spectrum were exposed.

Countries around the world passed laws and signed treaties in response to the danger of weapons that could adversely effect human behavior or manipulate human cognition.

The Russians banned all EMF weapons in These treaties have roots in the human radiation experiments of the s, s and s. In effect, these treaties declared a basic tenant of human rights and cognitive liberties.

The idea was to streamline the military, improve soldier performance, control the fighting in real-time and avoid soldier mortality. Toward this end, the concept was to enhance the ability of soldiers in the field to interface with computer systems by using their own brain waves.

The US began to fund research into decoding the brain as well as other neurological research. While developments in brain research are touted for their amazing therapeutic advances in the medical field, they primarily serve the purposes of the US military.

Americans have little idea about the research concerning the capabilities of electromagnetism, directed acoustics, or computer-human interfacing. The majority of Americans do not know that we are currently using these new-concept weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan.

DARPA and various military research labs provide a view of the current technology available to enhance US soldiers in the field and manipulate the emotions and behaviors of the perceived enemy.

As American sentiment toward the Iraq war spirals downward, along with the approval ratings of the US president, domestic civil disobedience is likely to rise, as it has in many countries in response to US foreign policy. Are new electromagnetic weapons in the possession of the government be used on American citizens?

You are here

The issue at hand is whether the research and technology currently being developed will benefit or harm us and how much liberty we are willing to sacrifice for a possibly skewed sense of national security and protection.Description Soviet terminology US terminology Officers with diplomatic immunity Diplomatic cover, emphasizing that GRU assumed that the host nation assumed all military attaches were intelligence officers, but that some diplomats might actually be diplomats: Diplomatic cover Public association with the service's country, but no diplomatic immunity.

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton. This research explores the current capabilities of the US military to use electromagnetic (EMF) devices to harass, intimidate, and kill individuals and the continuing possibilities of violations of human rights by the testing and deployment of these weapons.

Get the latest breaking news across the U.S.

An analysis of the responsibility of a a military officer in the protection of us citizens

on kaja-net.com Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife. Therefore in this Court, at least, it is not a condition of immunity that one in that situation should pause to consider whether a reasonable man might not think it possible to fly with safety . Welcome to the Directives Division homepage.

The Directives Division administers and operates the DoD Issuances Program, the DoD Information Collections Program, DOD Forms Management Program, GAO Affairs, and the DoD Plain Language Program for the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

The GS group captures occupations that don't fit into other categories including environmental protection specialists, park rangers, morticians, chaplains, US Marshalls, safety and fire protection to .

Los Angeles Times - We are currently unavailable in your region