With modern technology and research studies, it is now possible to regenerate cells and even clone animals. For years, men have tried to modify the genetic make-up of animals for many applications. Another process known as transgenesis is being used in animals and plants.
On balance, the benefits of genetically modified foods outweigh the harms.
I offer the following three contentions to support a PRO ballot. Contention I-Health Despite the claims made by numerous pundits, a 10 year analysis of scientific records by Alessandro Nicolia of the University of Perugia concludes, "The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazard directly connected with the use of GM crops.
Most notably, William Langridge of The Scientific American reports that GM foods can be used as superior vehicles for vaccines due to their low cost and high accessibility.
According to Maria Clemente of the Biotechnology Research Institute, one of the most remarkable advancements has been the development a vaccine for Malaria, which currently has no such countermeasure.
The impact of such technology is staggering as the CDC reports thatpeople die annually from Malaria. Contention II-Adaptability GM foods also allow for farmers to rapidly adapt to a wide variety of otherwise unfavorable circumstances. These conditions can be placed into three broad categories.
First, Cornell University explains that many crops are susceptible to viruses which are very difficult to control. However, "yellow squash, papaya, and potatoes species have now been genetically engineered to resist such plant viruses.
An Analysis of the Con Case of the Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods Outweigh the Harms PAGES 2. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA. Because we are considering whether or not the benefits of GMO technology outweigh the harms, you should be evaluating this discussion with a cost-benefit analysis through a utilitarian framework. One must prove that they are bringing the greatest amount of good to the greatest number of people and I contend that GMOs can do that. Resolved: On balance, the benefits of genetically modified foods outweigh the harms. Introduction This is potentially a good topic and hopefully one even novice and junior-varsity debaters can handle with ease while still offering sufficient depth for more advanced debaters.
However, Philip Wigge of the John Innes Centre in Norwich has engineered plants so that they are able to grow in a more diverse range of temperatures.
Third, Jim Wallace of the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology reports that the increased agricultural output required to feed future generations will put enormous pressure on freshwater resources. Thankfully, numerous GM crops have been designed to resist such drought conditions.
Contention III-Efficiency A literature review of studies by Timo Kaphengst of the Ecologic Institute of Berlin reports that GM foods can also posses numerous traits that improve their efficiency such as immunity to herbicides like Roundup and the ability to produce their own insecticide.
These traits allow farmers to spray fewer chemicals. The benefits of these efficiencies are threefold. First, they lower food prices.
Second, they preserve the environment. Zilberman furthers that without the efficiency of GM foods, an area the size of Utah would have had to have been converted into farmland to produce the same amount of food. Moreover, a study by Peter Barfoot published in Landes Bioscience quantifies that GM foods have reduced the environmental impact associated with herbicide and insecticide use on crops by Third, they have been an economic boom for farmers.
For all these reasons and many more, I strongly urge a PRO ballot. Also a new test conducted by British scientists showed that 16 out 30 hormones were inactive.Con's evidence shouldn't factor in to whether or not the benefits of GM crops outweigh the harms because his evidence doesn't compare glyphosate to other currently used herbicides in .
Con Case Introduction: We must take the con side of the resolution: Resolved: On balance, the benefits of genetically modified foods outweigh the harms.
You must evaluate today’s debate with a cost benefit analysis, and vote con if the harms outweigh the benefits. Genetically modified (GM) food comes from organisms whose DNA has been changed. This technology has sparked controversy as some people say it goes against the rules of nature.
Benefits of GM. Check out the online debate Resolved: On Balance, the benefits of Genetically Modified Foods Outweigh the Harms. The term GM foods or GMOs (genetically-modified organisms) is most commonly used to refer to crop plants created for human or animal consumption using the latest molecu- lar biology techniques.
LBRT: On balance, the benefits of genetically modified foods outweigh the harms. pro- -analysis that aggregates and examines the results of existing research studies looking at GM soybeans, maize, a found that GM technology increased crop yields by 22 percent, reduced.